Date: 17/11/1988
UMMOAELEWEE
Number of copies 42
Spain
WE'LL BE DISTRIBUTING THIS LETTER IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES BEFOREHAND WE'RE GIVING YOU THIS COPY IN CASE YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS.
PLEASE READ IT DURING THE MEETING
Esteemed man from OYAGAA:
We are saddened by the situation that has arisen on your land as a result of the shroud. But do not judge our sadness to have a religious motive. We arrive to integrate on your cold star motivated by cultural reasons, being convinced that your Social Network has a rich history valuing the fact that you are in a less advanced state than ours, that your psychology has a surprising typological variety and that your aesthetic talent (Pictural) is undoubtedly much superior to ours (although ummo's OEMMII is significantly more advanced). Bear in mind that the appearance of hominids on our extinct star predates the appearance of human life on your geoid.
We're not just interested in historical-geographical culture, but also in the complex network of knowledge (geology, biology, astronomy, etc.) that makes up the YAANEEYA (THE EXISTENTIAL COMPLEX) in which you find yourselves integrated.
As witnesses of this humanity, your heritage, we didn't want to intervene, but remain mere observers. We are a team of twenty-seven travellers located in various countries on Earth, and we maintain correspondence with smaller groups from Canada, Australia, Spain, the Soviet Union, Zimbabwe and a few others. Our information is limited to submitting our culture to you, without actively interfering in internal problems. (Spain was the only exception after our existence was made public).
The first years of our stay here (1950) were very hard, because our notions of you were very limited, and the languages we learned were very rudimentary. My brothers at the time were truly panicked that our existence among you would be discovered. As the years went by, we came to understand that it takes more than a few declarations of identity to be believed. It was necessary to validate our existence on OYAGAA with indisputable proof (scientific verifications), without which our testimony would be reduced to just a few of your brothers accused of having an irrational mentality. This presupposes an almost perfect alibi. Being able to pass among you as simply disturbed people with a systematized delusion of being extraterrestrials, we would remain free of any unwanted harassment. (People say we're a group of prankster academics, or an international organization with unknown aims, that we're throwing up a smokescreen - playing on our name - with a very different purpose, such as the sociometric study of UFO credulity, or other perhaps even murkier motivations. Perhaps an unconfessed association with criminal ends. Now we'll discuss our liaison with a religious association defending the Holy Shroud...).
However, we repeat that our interest in the Shroud has a very different significance, which we will briefly outline for you. In the course of history, various mithyco-religious currents have emerged in your midst, demanding that mankind believe in extraterrestrial life, headed by a creator god or a set of deified entities who would govern extra-corporeal life. Naturally, this desire manifested itself in the universal context, and we couldn't be an exception.
On UMMO we had another OEMMIWOA (UMMOWOA) of similar characteristics to those of other cold stars with a comparable level of evolution. If the cultural state is analogous, it's inevitable that people will identify it with a divine spirit. And in the few cold stars where it hasn't yet appeared, people are waiting in expectation for its arrival (if people are informed beforehand).
Today we know that a being of this conformation belongs to another species. It undergoes a profound mutation that changes its genome in depth. In other words, the change of species forces a series of DNA fragments to change structure. We're not talking about a simple chain of nucleic acids permuted by a chemical or viral agent, as your genetic experts are currently contemplating (such mutations are real, but earth biologists are still refusing to accept an agent that could cause directed teleonomy (vitalist theory)). In this way, it's unthinkable to presume such ordered genetic changes in a single couple. (A Spanish group was informed further) But we affirm that such a change exists and the new species has been known to you as Jessuha (Jesus).
His typology or phenotype is similar to that of Homo Sapiens Sapiens, although his brain, reproductive mechanism (he was unable to have children with a normal woman) and certain physiological functions differ markedly. What's more, he's a more evolved individual, with a much higher-than-average capacity for conscientiousness. It must be stressed that there was no divine intervention in his creation. Its existence can be explained in the light of biology. On an OOYAA (Cold Star) where such an OOMMIIWOA occurs, its sex is indifferent, although in our respective humanities (Earth and Ummo) the form of GEE (Male) has coincided. We know of cooled Asters on which OMMIIWOA was female.
It's necessary to point out (although we feel we're hurting your feelings) that we don't share the same idea of creation as OOYAGAA's humanity. God would be a superior entity who, for you, is both creator and responsible for all his creatures. In principle, God would be a perfect entity who would explain man's survival on Earth. (For didactic purposes, we identify God with WOA, although the two concepts are radically different).
Woa, on the other hand, is a concept inserted into the Universe itself and parameterized by science. It's a very different concept, which we'll explain on another occasion. Although the birth of an OEMMIWOA is not determined by the express will of the deity, it does produce a physical effect that is incomprehensible to the current state of science, but which is as rare as spherical rays or the explosion of a supernova. That's why we're studying the figure of Jesus so carefully, regardless of the religious connotations you so cherish and which we deeply respect. This is our purely scientific interest in the case.
There are profound differences between you and our conception of the World. Not only with regard to our doctrine, but also in the very basis of formal Logic. You accept the principle of the excluded third on the basis of Aristotle's teaching; we, on the other hand, base our existence on a very distinct logical versatility. That's why our relationship with you is so difficult, forcing us to make costly adaptations. Our thinking is based on principles that can be parameterized and scientifically observed. The rest serves as pure speculation and an enriching source for our future models. We are therefore very rigorous in our beliefs.
But for you, this reasoning is not convincing in absolute terms. It would take several tomes to explain to you with reason what we have expressed. We are aware that our explanations are not orthodox on OOYAAGAA and you must interpret them as pure clarifications of our position. We had no religious motivation, and we view the historical figure of Jesus from a different perspective. We are simply outraged by the imposture committed, under scientific coordinates. It pains us to consider that the only proof you had has unfortunately been subtracted, resulting in a long delay in the evolution of the Social Network in which you are immersed.
Your religious phenomenon was unavoidable at your evolutionary level, as some of your brothers considered that everything was negative. We regret to disagree with this assessment. Although on the whole religious appreciations have been alienating and distorted, the positions of your sincere brothers have enriched the Social Network and we qualify their conduct as negentropic. (meaning non-regressive, full of goodness).
In any case, we were amazed by the worldwide stir caused by accelerated mass spectrometry dating based on the radiocarbon in the samples. We admired the passion and exaltation with which the news was greeted. Clerics and anti-clerics alike have launched themselves fanatically, without any knowledge of the facts, to refute antagonistic positions, for no reason at all.
For example, they attack the measurements taken in the Oxford, Zurich and Arizona laboratories, claiming that the scientists are so stupid that they didn't realize that the samples contained carbonaceous growths deposited over time. These commentators ignore the fact that the small samples were chemically washed precisely to nullify this criticism. Even more insane is a journalist's assessment that it is the radiation present in the Shroud that is to blame (These people continue to believe that the trace left by the body is radioactive in nature. If the linen had been altered by ionizing rays, the radioactive carbon evaluation would give an earlier date. Exactly the opposite is true, and the shroud would have been dated several centuries before the year one (of Jessuha's era).
The Shroud's enemies, on the other hand, link themselves to this discovery of fraud, considering
that the imposture is so obvious that it's not worth insisting on the case. Both positions are monstrously misleading, and let's see why.
In the Christian world in which you live (both for and against) your actions are unconsciously modulated by occult feelings of a religious nature, and this seriously distorts your actions. Try to restrict yourself to objective data, regardless of the sympathy or antipathy you feel for people and ideas: and reason calmly. Would you risk following us?
We invite you to analyze objectively. Start with us. You've received a strange letter signed by strangers who claim to come from an even stranger place. This is highly improbable, and we invite you to call us mentally ill, or simply people who have nothing to do but play jokes on you, or shrewd delinquents with ulterior motives. Forget about us, and stick to the facts.
Analyze the Shroud carefully. Three highly reliable centers determine, with explicable deviations, that the period in which the shroud was woven oscillates (on a normal error curve) around centuries XI to XV. If you have a critical mindset, admit this assessment.
Once official science has made you see the medieval deception of the Shroud, you begin to see "very clearly" the enigma of the imprint of the traces of the body. This would explain why such an imprint is not cleared up by the transfer of exogenous products secreted by the decomposing body. On the contrary, it has been proven that the traces left on the sheet are due to a turning of the fabric molecules caused by high temperature (over 200 degrees). This would be due to the fact that the shroud had not been painted, but instead had been falsified using a reproduction of Jesus, made of a metal alloy and heated to semi-incandescence. This would seem to elucidate an imposture committed between centuries XI and XV, using the credulity of believing OEMMIIs.
This would explain why those who refuse to admit the supernatural refute its authenticity, and why we don't accept thaumaturgical influences on a piece of cloth. Vittorio Delfino Pesce was the first to denounce the deception on television in 1987, getting close to the modus operandi and suggesting that it (the forged shroud) had been made using a metal bas-relief overheated to 230 degrees.
But the enigma has not been so simply dismantled. Let's analyze the question dispassionately, coldly and scientifically. Who, in an age of cultural obscurantism, would be capable of such a prodigy? It would have had to have been a man familiar with photographic optics, capable of understanding what a negative would be and foreseeing what Secondo Pia would discover in 1898, and that in the middle of the 20th century we would obtain a three-dimensional image, ahead of NASA technicians. The unknown counterfeiter would also have had to have an erudition, not only of how men braided their hair in those days, but also of the texture with which a weave was made, elaborate with linen.
Most astonishing would be the forensic knowledge of a man capable of locating on a hand the exact point of crucifixion, by locating it on the area of the carpus that you anatomically call "Destot's Point". Don't forget that the artists of the time painted the body nailed in the palmar areas, and his mastery of rendering by means of expert criminological knowledge, the abuse resulting from the torture to which the victim was subjected. What's more, it draws the attention of anyone who penetrates the hyper-puritanical mentality of the time to the lack of modesty demonstrated by depicting the trace of her body's nudity.
We denounce the sad reality. The Shroud was fraudulently altered in 1929 (the decision was adopted in 1928). The falsification took about eight months to complete (1927). It is based on the authentic original photographed by Secondo Pia.
In Spain, you can obtain further information on this subject from the following brothers:
JULIO CESAR IGLESIAS
Phone 7336871 MADRID ALFREDO LARA GUITARD
Calle Goya 99-2 derecha. C
28009 MADRID
We have chosen these gentlemen because they are characterized by their independence of judgement and because they reject us overall, doubting our testimony substantially. Both are reliable professionals. The first is a journalist, the second a psychiatrist.
ummo-sciences: D499 |TP-101 to 104